By James Kirkup, Political Correspondent Published: 11:53AM GMT 05 March 2010Link to this video
Speaking at Sir John Chilcot"s exploration in to the war, Mr Brown gave his majority pithy publicity nonetheless for the conflict.
He additionally insisted that he had entirely saved the Armed Forces as they rebuilt for war.Gordon Brown: fight in Iraq was "right preference for right reasons" Iraq inquiry: Brown defends counterclaim spending curbs Bush "would not have invaded Iraq had he well known about WMD" British infantry denied equipment, says SAS head Brown at the Iraq Inquiry: as it happened Iraq Inquiry Q&A
Mr Brown has frequency oral about his purpose in the events heading up to the war, that cost 179 British lives.
Some Labour supporters hold Mr Brown possibly harboured in isolation doubts about the war, or was close out of the decision-making routine by Tony Blair, afterwards the budding minister.
But in his evidence, Mr Brown deserted both those ideas, insisted he had actively corroborated Mr Blair in his preference to invade.
Mr Brown was austere that he had been "in the loop" of Mr Blair"s decisions. He pronounced he had five in isolation briefings from the comprehension agencies, that convince him that Iraq was an "aggressor state."
He said: "I had full information. There is no clarity in that I had unsound information. I was entirely intent in the discussions that had taken place. I was concerned in the monetary discussions in propinquity to the troops options.
He added: "In conditions of my attribute with the Prime Minister, I was entirely in line with what was being done."
Mr Brown pronounced he asked for briefings about Iraq"s troops programmes prior to the war.
"I had five meetings with the comprehension chiefs. These were really full briefings," he said. "The report I was since was about the weaponry that the Iraqi supervision held."
The disaster to find justification of weapons of mass drop in Iraq showed that ministers should not rely as well most on intelligence, Mr Brown said.
"I think we have schooled that comprehension can give us insights in to what is happening, but we have got to be some-more sure, as people have recognised, about the inlet of the comprehension we were reception from sure people."
Mr Brown, who was Chancellor at the time of the invasion, will face questions after about his appropriation of the Armed Forces.
The early doubt focused on the rave to the war. Mr Brown insisted that he had told the Ministry of Defence that he would account whatever commanders believed was indispensable for troops action.
"At each point, I finished it transparent we would await yes or no choice the troops motionless on," he said.
Mr Brown additionally pronounced that his Treasury had been concerned in formulation for post-war Iraq. He referred to that the US supervision was especially to censure for the disharmony that followed the tumble of Saddam Hussein in Apr 2003.
He said: "Its one of my regrets that I wasnt means to some-more successful on pulling the Americans serve on this issue.
"I cannot take personal shortcoming for all that went wrong. I did a paper for the Americans observant that this indispensable to be done."